lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RESEND] ACPI / processor_idle: use dead loop instead of io port access for wait
Date
Sorry for the delay.

On Monday, September 9, 2019 9:39:37 AM CEST Yin Fengwei wrote:
> In function acpi_idle_do_entry(), we do an io port access to guarantee
> hardware behavior. But it could trigger unnecessary vmexit for
> virtualization environemnt.

Is this a theoretical problem, or do you actually see it?

If you see it, I'd like to have a pointer to a bug report regarding it
or similar.

> From the comments of this part of code, we could use busy wait instead
> of io port access to guarantee hardware behavior and avoid unnecessary
> vmexit.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yin Fengwei <fengwei.yin@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> index ed56c6d20b08..676553228e8f 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,8 @@ struct cpuidle_driver acpi_idle_driver = {
> };
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_CSTATE
> +static struct timespec64 dummy_delta = {0L, 0L};
> +
> static
> DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor_cx * [CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX], acpi_cstate);
>
> @@ -64,6 +66,18 @@ static int disabled_by_idle_boot_param(void)
> boot_option_idle_override == IDLE_HALT;
> }
>
> +static void dummy_wait(void)
> +{
> + struct timespec64 now, target;
> +
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&now);
> + target = timespec64_add(now, dummy_delta);
> +
> + do {
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&now);
> + } while (timespec64_compare(&now, &target) < 0);
> +}

Why not to use ndelay() instead of this? ->

> +
> /*
> * IBM ThinkPad R40e crashes mysteriously when going into C2 or C3.
> * For now disable this. Probably a bug somewhere else.
> @@ -660,8 +674,12 @@ static void __cpuidle acpi_idle_do_entry(struct acpi_processor_cx *cx)
> inb(cx->address);
> /* Dummy wait op - must do something useless after P_LVL2 read
> because chipsets cannot guarantee that STPCLK# signal
> - gets asserted in time to freeze execution properly. */
> - inl(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block.address);
> + gets asserted in time to freeze execution properly.
> +
> + Previously, we do io port access here which could trigger
> + unnecessary trap to HV for virtualization env. We use dead
> + loop here to avoid the impact to virtualization env. */
> + dummy_wait();
> }
> }
>
> @@ -683,7 +701,7 @@ static int acpi_idle_play_dead(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int index)
> else if (cx->entry_method == ACPI_CSTATE_SYSTEMIO) {
> inb(cx->address);
> /* See comment in acpi_idle_do_entry() */
> - inl(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block.address);
> + dummy_wait();
> } else
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> @@ -902,6 +920,7 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_cstate_first_run_checks(void)
> {
> acpi_status status;
> static int first_run;
> + struct timespec64 ts0, ts1;
>
> if (first_run)
> return;
> @@ -912,6 +931,13 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_cstate_first_run_checks(void)
> max_cstate);
> first_run++;
>
> + /* profiling the time used for dummy wait op */
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts0);
> + inl(acpi_gbl_FADT.xpm_timer_block.address);
> + ktime_get_real_ts64(&ts1);

-> And simply measure the number of nsecs this takes?

> +
> + dummy_delta = timespec64_sub(ts1, ts0);
> +
> if (acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control && !nocst) {
> status = acpi_os_write_port(acpi_gbl_FADT.smi_command,
> acpi_gbl_FADT.cst_control, 8);
> @@ -920,6 +946,7 @@ static inline void acpi_processor_cstate_first_run_checks(void)
> "Notifying BIOS of _CST ability failed"));
> }
> }
> +
> #else
>
> static inline int disabled_by_idle_boot_param(void) { return 0; }
>




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-11 11:05    [W:0.147 / U:0.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site