[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] regulator: core: Skip balancing of the enabled regulators in regulator_enable()
Hi Mark,

On 09.10.2019 16:13, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:29:00PM +0200, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>> Okay, then what is the conclusion, as I got lost a bit? How do you want
>> this issue to be fixed?
> We should revert the enable call, it shouldn't be required, and ideally
> the default balancer could be updated to only make configuration changes
> if they're actually required which would help avoid triggering any such
> things in future if we don't absolutely have to.

Okay, Then in case of regulator core - do you accept the initial patch
as it indeed forces the default balancer to avoid unnecessary changes,
or do you want me to rewrite it to assume min_uV = current_uV for the
already enabled regulators during the initial balancing, like suggested
by Dmitry?

Best regards
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-10 12:21    [W:0.099 / U:6.380 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site