lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Oct]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] eldie generated code for folded p4d/pud
From
Date

Hi Kirill,

On 10/10/19 1:56 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:26:55PM +0000, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>
>> This series elides extraneous generate code for folded p4d/pud.
>> This came up when trying to remove __ARCH_USE_5LEVEL_HACK from ARC port.
>> The code saving are not a while lot, but still worthwhile IMHO.
>
> Agreed.

Thx.

So given we are folding pmd too, it seemed we could do the following as well.

+#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED
void pmd_clear_bad(pmd_t *);
+#else
+#define pmd_clear_bad(pmd) do { } while (0)
+#endif

+#ifndef __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED
void pmd_clear_bad(pmd_t *pmd)
{
pmd_ERROR(*pmd);
pmd_clear(pmd);
}
+#endif

I stared at generated code and it seems a bit wrong.
free_pgd_range() -> pgd_none_or_clear_bad() is no longer checking for unmapped pgd
entries as pgd_none/pgd_bad are all stubs returning 0.

This whole pmd folding is a bit confusing considering I only revisit it every few
years :-) Abstraction wise, __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED only has pgd, pte but even in
this regime bunch of pmd macros are still valid

pmd_set(pmdp, ptep) {
*pmdp.pud.p4d.pgd = (unsigned long)ptep
}

Is there a better way to make a mental model of this code folding.

In an ideal world pmd folded would have meant pmd_* routines just vanish - poof.
So in that sense I like your implementation under #[45]LEVEL_HACK where the level
simply vanishes by code like #define p4d_t pgd_t. Perhaps there is lot of historic
baggage, proliferated into arch code so hard to untangle.

Thx,
-Vineet

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-10-10 22:07    [W:0.232 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site