Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 1 Oct 2019 11:59:11 +0200 | From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] string-choice: add yesno(), onoff(), enableddisabled(), plural() helpers |
| |
On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:42:34PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 01 Oct 2019, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 11:07:39AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> The kernel has plenty of ternary operators to choose between constant > >> strings, such as condition ? "yes" : "no", as well as value == 1 ? "" : > >> "s": > >> > >> $ git grep '? "yes" : "no"' | wc -l > >> 258 > >> $ git grep '? "on" : "off"' | wc -l > >> 204 > >> $ git grep '? "enabled" : "disabled"' | wc -l > >> 196 > >> $ git grep '? "" : "s"' | wc -l > >> 25 > >> > >> Additionally, there are some occurences of the same in reverse order, > >> split to multiple lines, or otherwise not caught by the simple grep. > >> > >> Add helpers to return the constant strings. Remove existing equivalent > >> and conflicting functions in i915, cxgb4, and USB core. Further > >> conversion can be done incrementally. > >> > >> While the main goal here is to abstract recurring patterns, and slightly > >> clean up the code base by not open coding the ternary operators, there > >> are also some space savings to be had via better string constant > >> pooling. > >> > >> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> > >> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> > >> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > >> Cc: Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@chelsio.com> > >> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org > >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> > >> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org > >> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> > >> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> > >> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> # v1 > > > > As this is a totally different version, please drop my reviewed-by as > > that's really not true here :( > > I did indicate it was for v1. Indeed v2 was different, but care to > elaborate what's wrong with v3?
No idea, but I haven't reviewed it yet, so to put my tag on there isn't the nicest...
greg k-h
| |