lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 08/11] ASoC: Intel: atom: Make PCI dependency explicit
On Sat, Jan 5, 2019 at 11:06 AM Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> After 'commit 5d32a66541c4 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without
> CONFIG_PCI set")' dependencies on CONFIG_PCI that previously were
> satisfied implicitly through dependencies on CONFIG_ACPI have to be
> specified directly. This code relies on IOSF_MBI and IOSF_MBI depends
> on PCI. For this reason, add a direct dependency on CONFIG_PCI to the
> IOSF_MBI driver.
>
> Fixes: 5d32a66541c46 ("PCI/ACPI: Allow ACPI to be built without CONFIG_PCI set")
> Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya <okaya@kernel.org>

Sinan, I thought you received an ACK from Pierre-Louis on this one, didn't you?

> ---
> sound/soc/intel/Kconfig | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
> index 99a62ba409df..bd9fd2035c55 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
> +++ b/sound/soc/intel/Kconfig
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_PCI
> config SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM_ACPI
> tristate "ACPI HiFi2 (Baytrail, Cherrytrail) Platforms"
> default ACPI
> - depends on X86 && ACPI
> + depends on X86 && ACPI && PCI
> select SND_SST_IPC_ACPI
> select SND_SST_ATOM_HIFI2_PLATFORM
> select SND_SOC_ACPI_INTEL_MATCH
> --

Mark, assuming that the ACK above was given here, do you want me to
take this patch or do you want to take care of it yourself?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-07 12:16    [W:0.057 / U:1.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site