lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 5.0-rc1 (test results)
On Sun, Jan 06, 2019 at 06:14:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> So this was a fairly unusual merge window with the holidays, and as a
> result I'm not even going to complain about the pull requests that
> ended up coming in late. It all mostly worked out fine, I think. And
> lot of people got their pull requests in early, and hopefully had a
> calm holiday season. Thanks again to everybody.
>
> The numbering change is not indicative of anything special. If you
> want to have an official reason, it's that I ran out of fingers and
> toes to count on, so 4.21 became 5.0. There's no nice git object
> numerology this time (we're _about_ 6.5M objects in the git repo), and
> there isn't any major particular feature that made for the release
> numbering either. Of course, depending on your particular interests,
> some people might well find a feature _they_ like so much that they
> think it can do as a reason for incrementing the major number.
>
> So go wild. Make up your own reason for why it's 5.0.
>
> Because as usual, there's a lot of changes in there. Not because this
> merge window was particularly big - but even our smaller merge windows
> aren't exactly small. It's a very solid and average merge window with
> just under 11k commits (or about 11.5k if you count merges).
>
> The stats look fairly normal. About 50% is drivers, 20% is
> architecture updates, 10% is tooling, and the remaining 20% is all
> over (documentation, networking, filesystems, header file updates,
> core kernel code..). Nothing particular stands out, although I do like
> seeing how some ancient drivers are getting put out to pasture
> (*cought*isdn*cough*).
>
> As usual even the shortlog is much too big to post, so the summary
> below is only a list of the pull requests I merged.
>
> Go test. Kick the tires. Be the first kid on your block running a 5.0
> pre-release kernel.
>

For v5.0-rc1-1-g3bd6e94bec12:

Build results:
total: 158 pass: 155 fail: 3
Failed builds:
csky:defconfig
csky:allnoconfig
csky:tinyconfig
Qemu test results:
total: 332 pass: 332 fail: 0

mm/memory.c: In function ‘__pte_alloc’:
mm/memory.c:406:18: error: too few arguments to function ‘pte_alloc_one’

mm/memory.c: In function ‘__pte_alloc_kernel’:
mm/memory.c:439:15: error: too few arguments to function ‘pte_alloc_one_kernel’

mm/memory.c: In function ‘do_fault_around’:
mm/memory.c:3363:23: error: too few arguments to function ‘pte_alloc_one’

Bisect points to commit 4cf58924951ef ("mm: treewide: remove unused address
argument from pte_alloc functions"). Interesting - wasn't that supposed
to be automatic ?

csky does use the the removed address argument, so I won't even try to
provide a patch. Copying csky maintainer instead.

Guenter

---
# bad: [3bd6e94bec122a951d462c239b47954cf5f36e33] arch: restore generic-y += shmparam.h for some architectures
# good: [3fed6ae4b027f9c93be18520f87bd06bdffd196b] ia64: fix compile without swiotlb
git bisect start 'HEAD' '3fed6ae4b027'
# bad: [e9666d10a5677a494260d60d1fa0b73cc7646eb3] jump_label: move 'asm goto' support test to Kconfig
git bisect bad e9666d10a5677a494260d60d1fa0b73cc7646eb3
# bad: [b23b0ea3708c3dec599966fc856836aca48835b9] Merge tag 'armsoc-late' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc
git bisect bad b23b0ea3708c3dec599966fc856836aca48835b9
# bad: [9ee3b3f4a5eb523ef27675ac2fcd2269b9d68767] Merge tag 'csky-for-linus-4.21' of git://github.com/c-sky/csky-linux
git bisect bad 9ee3b3f4a5eb523ef27675ac2fcd2269b9d68767
# good: [655c16a8ce9c15842547f40ce23fd148aeccc074] exec: separate MM_ANONPAGES and RLIMIT_STACK accounting
git bisect good 655c16a8ce9c15842547f40ce23fd148aeccc074
# bad: [a65981109f294ba7e64b33ad3b4575a4636fce66] Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)
git bisect bad a65981109f294ba7e64b33ad3b4575a4636fce66
# bad: [3bb5f4ac55dd91d516e7e36b45c94bd57efbb068] kernel/locking/mutex.c: remove caller signal_pending branch predictions
git bisect bad 3bb5f4ac55dd91d516e7e36b45c94bd57efbb068
# good: [b058809bfc8faeb7b7cae047666e23375a060059] scripts/gdb: fix lx-version string output
git bisect good b058809bfc8faeb7b7cae047666e23375a060059
# bad: [4cf58924951ef80eec636b863e7a53973c44261a] mm: treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions
git bisect bad 4cf58924951ef80eec636b863e7a53973c44261a
# good: [ff1522bb7d98450c72aea729f0b4147bc9986aed] initramfs: cleanup incomplete rootfs
git bisect good ff1522bb7d98450c72aea729f0b4147bc9986aed
# first bad commit: [4cf58924951ef80eec636b863e7a53973c44261a] mm: treewide: remove unused address argument from pte_alloc functions

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-07 20:27    [W:0.041 / U:7.388 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site