Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 01 Feb 2019 11:38:10 +1100 | From | tom burkart <> | Subject | Re: Fwd: [PATCH v14 0/3] PPS: pps-gpio PPS ECHO implementation |
| |
Quoting Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>:
> On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 12:40 +1100, tom burkart wrote: >> Quoting Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com>: >> -------- >> Subject Re: [PATCH v14 2/3] dt-bindings: pps: pps-gpio PPS ECHO >> implementation >> >> I think this patch it's OK but I'm asking to myself if it should be >> merged with >> next one... logically it describes what patch 3/3 does so why do we >> keep them >> separated? >> ------- >> I have separated it because scripts/checkpatch.pl insists it needs to >> be separated. > > checkpatch doesn't insist on anything. It's a stupid script. > > Always prefer your best judgment over a stupid script.
Further references:
From Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt:
1) The Documentation/ and include/dt-bindings/ portion of the patch should be a separate patch. The preferred subject prefix for binding patches is:
"dt-bindings: <binding dir>: ..."
Tom
| |