Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/selftests/pkeys: fork() to check for state being preserved | From | Dave Hansen <> | Date | Thu, 3 Jan 2019 10:57:24 -0800 |
| |
On 1/3/19 5:52 AM, Sasha Levin wrote: > This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. > The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all > > The bot has tested the following trees: v4.20.0, v4.19.13, v4.14.91, v4.9.148, v4.4.169, v3.18.131, > > v4.20.0: Build OK! > v4.19.13: Build OK! > v4.14.91: Build OK! > v4.9.148: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: > f50b4878329a ("x86/pkeys/selftests: Fix pkey exhaustion test off-by-one")
Protection keys was merged in 4.8. We can ignore any of the selftests changes before that.
But, it looks like the 4.9 selftests are a bit behind mainline. Probably because I didn't cc stable@ on f50b4878329a. I don't have a strong opinion as to how up-to-date we want to keep the -stable selftests. Shua, is there a usual way that folks do this?
| |