lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [28]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] rtc: bd70528: Initial support for ROHM bd70528 RTC
On Sat, Jan 26, 2019 at 08:30:24AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 1/25/19 3:05 AM, Matti Vaittinen wrote:



> > +static int bd70528_set_wake(struct bd70528 *bd70528,
> > + int enable, int *old_state)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + unsigned int ctrl_reg;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(bd70528->chip.regmap, BD70528_REG_WAKE_EN, &ctrl_reg);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (old_state) {
> > + if (ctrl_reg & BD70528_MASK_WAKE_EN)
> > + *old_state |= BD70528_WAKE_STATE_BIT;
> > + else
> > + *old_state &= ~BD70528_WAKE_STATE_BIT;
> > +
> > + if ((!enable) == (!(*old_state & BD70528_WAKE_STATE_BIT)))
> > + return 0;
>
> I think
> if (enable == !!(*old_state & BD70528_WAKE_STATE_BIT))
> would be much better readable. Even if not, there are way too many ()
> in the above conditional.
>

The substitution is not equivalent to original. I think you mean:

if (!!enable == !!(*old_state & BD70528_WAKE_STATE_BIT))



--

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-28 21:28    [W:0.104 / U:1.072 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site