| From | Sasha Levin <> | Subject | [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 253/258] proc/sysctl: fix return error for proc_doulongvec_minmax() | Date | Mon, 28 Jan 2019 10:59:19 -0500 |
| |
From: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn>
[ Upstream commit 09be178400829dddc1189b50a7888495dd26aa84 ]
If the number of input parameters is less than the total parameters, an EINVAL error will be returned.
For example, we use proc_doulongvec_minmax to pass up to two parameters with kern_table:
{ .procname = "monitor_signals", .data = &monitor_sigs, .maxlen = 2*sizeof(unsigned long), .mode = 0644, .proc_handler = proc_doulongvec_minmax, },
Reproduce:
When passing two parameters, it's work normal. But passing only one parameter, an error "Invalid argument"(EINVAL) is returned.
[root@cl150 ~]# echo 1 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals 1 2 [root@cl150 ~]# echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals -bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument [root@cl150 ~]# echo $? 1 [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals 3 2 [root@cl150 ~]#
The following is the result after apply this patch. No error is returned when the number of input parameters is less than the total parameters.
[root@cl150 ~]# echo 1 2 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals 1 2 [root@cl150 ~]# echo 3 > /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals [root@cl150 ~]# echo $? 0 [root@cl150 ~]# cat /proc/sys/kernel/monitor_signals 3 2 [root@cl150 ~]#
There are three processing functions dealing with digital parameters, __do_proc_dointvec/__do_proc_douintvec/__do_proc_doulongvec_minmax.
This patch deals with __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax, just as __do_proc_dointvec does, adding a check for parameters 'left'. In __do_proc_douintvec, its code implementation explicitly does not support multiple inputs.
static int __do_proc_douintvec(...){ ... /* * Arrays are not supported, keep this simple. *Do not* add * support for them. */ if (vleft != 1) { *lenp = 0; return -EINVAL; } ... }
So, just __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax has the problem. And most use of proc_doulongvec_minmax/proc_doulongvec_ms_jiffies_minmax just have one parameter.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1544081775-15720-1-git-send-email-cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Cheng Lin <cheng.lin130@zte.com.cn> Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org> --- kernel/sysctl.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl.c b/kernel/sysctl.c index cc02050fd0c4..32dea29d05a0 100644 --- a/kernel/sysctl.c +++ b/kernel/sysctl.c @@ -2767,6 +2767,8 @@ static int __do_proc_doulongvec_minmax(void *data, struct ctl_table *table, int bool neg; left -= proc_skip_spaces(&p); + if (!left) + break; err = proc_get_long(&p, &left, &val, &neg, proc_wspace_sep, -- 2.19.1
|