lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/8] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 reset controller binding
Date
Hi Rob,

On 22/01/2019 at 02:07, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:57:38AM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Update the Reset Controller's binding to add new SoC compatibility string.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
>> index 36952cc39993..badce6ef3ab3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
>> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ Its subnodes can be:
>> RSTC Reset Controller required properties:
>> - compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-rstc".
>> <chip> can be "at91sam9260", "at91sam9g45", "sama5d3" or "samx7"
>> + it also can be "microchip,sam9x60-rstc"
>
> How is this related to at91sam9260-rstc?

at91sam9260 and sam9x60 are completely different products (they share
the same core though...). I know the naming could be misleading but it
is like it is...

> The 'x' is a wildcard? We generally avoid wildcards.

Here, the 'x' is definitively not a wildcard nor a kind of "family"
name, it's included in the (upcoming) single product's name.

I hope it clarifies.

Best regards,
Nicolas

>> - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>> - clocks: phandle to input clock.
>>
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>


--
Nicolas Ferre
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-22 10:01    [W:0.044 / U:73.620 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site