| From | Greg Kroah-Hartman <> | Subject | [PATCH 4.20 076/111] ipv6: make icmp6_send() robust against null skb->dev | Date | Mon, 21 Jan 2019 14:43:10 +0100 |
| |
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
commit 8d933670452107e41165bea70a30dffbd281bef1 upstream.
syzbot was able to crash one host with the following stack trace :
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 8625 Comm: syz-executor4 Not tainted 4.20.0+ #8 RIP: 0010:dev_net include/linux/netdevice.h:2169 [inline] RIP: 0010:icmp6_send+0x116/0x2d30 net/ipv6/icmp.c:426 icmpv6_send smack_socket_sock_rcv_skb security_sock_rcv_skb sk_filter_trim_cap __sk_receive_skb dccp_v6_do_rcv release_sock
This is because a RX packet found socket owned by user and was stored into socket backlog. Before leaving RCU protected section, skb->dev was cleared in __sk_receive_skb(). When socket backlog was finally handled at release_sock() time, skb was fed to smack_socket_sock_rcv_skb() then icmp6_send()
We could fix the bug in smack_socket_sock_rcv_skb(), or simply make icmp6_send() more robust against such possibility.
In the future we might provide to icmp6_send() the net pointer instead of infering it.
Fixes: d66a8acbda92 ("Smack: Inform peer that IPv6 traffic has been blocked") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Piotr Sawicki <p.sawicki2@partner.samsung.com> Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
--- net/ipv6/icmp.c | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c +++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c @@ -421,10 +421,10 @@ static int icmp6_iif(const struct sk_buf static void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __u32 info, const struct in6_addr *force_saddr) { - struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev); struct inet6_dev *idev = NULL; struct ipv6hdr *hdr = ipv6_hdr(skb); struct sock *sk; + struct net *net; struct ipv6_pinfo *np; const struct in6_addr *saddr = NULL; struct dst_entry *dst; @@ -435,12 +435,16 @@ static void icmp6_send(struct sk_buff *s int iif = 0; int addr_type = 0; int len; - u32 mark = IP6_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark); + u32 mark; if ((u8 *)hdr < skb->head || (skb_network_header(skb) + sizeof(*hdr)) > skb_tail_pointer(skb)) return; + if (!skb->dev) + return; + net = dev_net(skb->dev); + mark = IP6_REPLY_MARK(net, skb->mark); /* * Make sure we respect the rules * i.e. RFC 1885 2.4(e)
|