[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't remove the request if bus-expired


"Zengtao (B)" <> writes:
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Felipe Balbi []
>>Sent: Monday, January 14, 2019 4:13 PM
>>To: Zengtao (B) <>
>>Cc: Zengtao (B) <>; Greg Kroah-Hartman
>>Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: don't remove the request if
>>* PGP Signed by an unknown key
>>Zeng Tao <> writes:
>>> We have already returned EAGAIN for bus-expiry, and it's designed to
>>> start with a future Frame number and start the transfer again. So we
>>> should not remove the request for that case.
>>> Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <>
>>Do we need a Fixes tag here? How about Cc stable? Can you share
>>tracepoints exposing the problem?
> I am not sure that we need to Fixes tag, it's not related to any single patch, but
> there is definitely something wrong, after rethinking it again, I found that there
> are still some problems for this patch, for the reties inside the driver, we should not
> remove the request, but if we return -EAGAIN to the gadget layer, we should because
> the gadget will requeue the request again if we return -EAGAIN.
> Any suggestions.

Well, that needs to be patched, sure. I'm just saying that we need to
blame a patch that was incomplete so we know which stable releases need
this. Perhaps the patch at fault here was my patch adding the retry
method for isoc transfers.

[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-21 10:04    [W:0.037 / U:0.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site