lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add devicetree binding for Oxalis
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 06:14:43PM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 10:07:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 8:21 PM Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 12:02:47PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 4:21 AM Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > > > <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Add devicetree binding for Oxalis board in JSON format. While adding
> > > > > that, let's fix the description for LS1012A also.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 3 ++-
> > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > index d34fe0749199..0f30142fe316 100644
> > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml
> > > > > @@ -173,12 +173,13 @@ properties:
> > > > > - fsl,vf610
> > > > > - fsl,vf610m4
> > > > >
> > > > > - - description: LS1021A based Boards
> > > > > + - description: LS1012A based Boards
> > > >
> > > > Well, yes that was wrong...
> > > >
> > > > > items:
> > > > > - enum:
> > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-rdb
> > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-frdm
> > > > > - fsl,ls1012a-qds
> > > > > + - ebs-systart,oxalis
> > > >
> > > > Sort alphabetically.
> > > >
> > > > > - const: fsl,ls1021a
> > > >
> > > > And this is wrong too.
> > > >
> > > > I you just change it, then we will be missing an entry for LS1021A.
> > > > What's the status of that SoC because there is no board dts file? We
> > > > should not have .dtsi files in the kernel which don't get built.
> > >
> > > Hmm, I do not see any LS1021A SoC .dtsi in the tree. I suspect it's
> > > just a typo of LS1012A.
> > >
> > > @Leo, do we have a LS1021A SoC?
> >
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/ls1021a.dtsi
>
> Oops, I only searched arm64 folder.
>
> So it seems the compatible of the boards below are missing there.
>
> ls1021a-moxa-uc-8410a.dts
> ls1021a-qds.dts
> ls1021a-twr.dts

So how should we proceed here? The above mentioned boards are lacking
compatible in dts files and I guess that's the reason they didn't get
mentioned in "fsl" binding file.

Should I just go ahead and add the compatibles for these boards and list
them in binding file?

Thanks,
Mani

>
> Shawn

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-21 08:13    [W:0.079 / U:0.748 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site