lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-omap: drop ->get_ro() implementation
* Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com> [190118 10:54]:
> Tony,
>
> On 16/01/19 9:17 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> [190116 13:28]:
> >> On Tue, Jan 15, 2019 at 05:28:36PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >>> The SDHCI core is know properly checking for the state of a WP GPIO,
> >>
> >> "know" -> "now"
> >>
> >>> so there is no longer any need for the sdhci-omap code to implement
> >>> ->get_ro() using mmc_gpio_get_ro().
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> Note: this patch has only been compiled tested, as I don't have the
> >>> hardware to test it.
> >>> ---
> >>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-omap.c | 1 -
> >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> I can't runtime test this myself, but it certainly looks like this would
> >> do the right thing because it calls the core now call the very same
> >> function as this used to, so:
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
> >>
> >> Adding Tony and linux-omap for a slightly wider audience and hopefully
> >> find someone to test this on. For reference, the whole series is here:
> >>
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mmc/list/?series=66905
> >
> > Thanks Kishon can you please review and test?
> >
>
> I can help with testing once Thomas posts a v2.

OK great thanks!

Tony

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-18 16:33    [W:0.289 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site