lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2019]   [Jan]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/6] Add clock support for Actions Semi S500 SoC
Hi Stephen,

On Fri, Jan 11, 2019 at 02:51:04PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Manivannan Sadhasivam (2018-12-31 10:55:11)
> > Hello,
> >
> > This patchset adds common clock support for Actions Semi S500 SoC of
> > the Owl family SoCs. This series is based on the initial work done
> > by Edgar Bernardi Righi. https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10587527/
> >
> > Since there isn't any update from him for long time, I took the liberty
> > to modify his patches, address review comments and send to list for review.
> >
> > This series has been tested on Allo Sparky SBC.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mani
> >
> > Edgar Bernardi Righi (1):
> > dt-bindings: clock: Add DT bindings for Actions Semi S500 CMU
> >
> > Manivannan Sadhasivam (5):
> > clk: actions: Add configurable PLL delay
> > ARM: dts: Add CMU support for Actions Semi Owl S500 SoC
> > ARM: dts: Remove fake UART clock for S500 based SBCs
> > clk: actions: Add clock driver for S500 SoC
> > MAINTAINERS: Add linux-actions mailing list for Actions Semi
>
> What's the merge strategy for these patches? Some are for clk, others
> are for arm-soc, etc. I see a sandwich of patches too so it sounds like
> I can't even take just the clk ones for fear of breaking something that
> the dts bits in the middle clear out of the way.
>

As we did with previous patchsets, clk patches will go through your tree
and I'll take the ARM/MAINTAINERS patches through Actions sub-tree. Let's
target these for 5.1. Even if your patches reach first, there won't be
any regression with existing DTS.

Thanks,
Mani

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2019-01-14 10:21    [W:0.138 / U:0.812 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site