lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v13 04/13] x86/sgx: Architectural structures
    On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 7:04 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com> wrote:
    >
    > On 09/03/2018 06:16 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
    > >> + EBLOCK = 0x9,
    > >> + EPA = 0xA,
    > >> + EWB = 0xB,
    > >> + ETRACK = 0xC,
    > >> + EAUG = 0xD,
    > >> + EMODPR = 0xE,
    > >> + EMODT = 0xF,
    > >> +};
    > > Hmm... This E prefix confuses me with (system wide) error codes. Has
    > > it been discussed before? If so, can you point on the conclusion why
    > > the current format is good?
    >
    > Making them SGX_EWHATEVER isn't a horrible idea.

    +1 here. Namespace will not shadow SDM naming scheme.

    --
    With Best Regards,
    Andy Shevchenko

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-09-04 18:07    [W:4.359 / U:0.476 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site