Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 27 Sep 2018 18:27:37 +0200 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/5] dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask handling |
| |
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:14:56PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: >> This just seemed more readable to me than min_not_zero, but if others >> prefer min_not_zero I can switch. > > Nah, just checking whether there were any intentionally different > assumptions compared to the couple of other places in the patch where > min_not_zero() *is* used. If it's purely a style thing then no worries > (personally I'd have written it yet another way anyway).
I'm curious: how would you have written it?
| |