lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] dma-direct: implement complete bus_dma_mask handling
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 05:14:56PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> This just seemed more readable to me than min_not_zero, but if others
>> prefer min_not_zero I can switch.
>
> Nah, just checking whether there were any intentionally different
> assumptions compared to the couple of other places in the patch where
> min_not_zero() *is* used. If it's purely a style thing then no worries
> (personally I'd have written it yet another way anyway).

I'm curious: how would you have written it?

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-27 18:28    [W:0.055 / U:0.064 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site