lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4.9 069/101] ubi: fastmap: Correctly handle interrupted erasures in EBA
Date
Lars,

Am Sonntag, 23. September 2018, 15:49:42 CEST schrieb Lars Persson:
> Hi Richard
>
> Sorry, I assumed this omission from -stable was a mistake.
>
> The timing for our boot increased from 45 seconds to 55 seconds on one
> chip and 42 seconds to 48 seconds on another chip. The regression was
> completely fixed by applying the extra patches. The way I see it the
> first patch is a significant slow-down so the second patch is required
> to restore performance.

okay, this is not good. Let's put the performance patch also into -stable
to get rid of that regression.
Usually I'm rather conservative with adding non-trivial material to -stable.
As history has shown, Fastmap is special. ;-)

Out of interest, what flashes are these? I'm interested in page vs. erase size.
Did you give UBIFS bulk-read try?

Greg, I'll send another mail which will state what patches are needed.

Thanks,
//richard



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-24 08:32    [W:2.057 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site