lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] kernel/kcov: Replace vm_insert_page with vmf_insert_page
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 7:52 PM Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 12:42:54AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > for (off = 0; off < size; off += PAGE_SIZE) {
> > page = vmalloc_to_page(kcov->area + off);
> > - if (vm_insert_page(vma, vma->vm_start + off, page))
> > - WARN_ONCE(1, "vm_insert_page() failed");
> > + if (vmf_insert_page(vma, vma->vm_start + off, page)
> > + != VM_FAULT_NOPAGE)
> > + WARN_ONCE(1, "vmf_insert_page() failed");
> > }
>
> I think this is the wrong approach (as well as being buggy).
>
> We should have a vmalloc_insert_range() _or something similar_ that
> replaces this entire loop. That makes each _user_ simpler. What you're
> trying to do right now makes each user more complex, and that's the
> wrong approach.

There are two different opinions here.

Andrey mentioned, to use vmf_insert_page() in fault handlers context and
not to remove vm_insert_page in his review comments.

And your opinion is to have vmalloc_insert_range() _or something similar_
that will replace whole loop. with this vm_insert_page will be removed.

Which one is better to go with ??

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-24 09:55    [W:1.293 / U:0.004 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site