lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Sep]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] PCI: kirin: Fix section mismatch warning
[+Paul]

On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 02:08:08PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 11:55 AM Nathan Chancellor
> <natechancellor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x4758cc): Section mismatch in reference from
> > the function kirin_pcie_probe() to the function
> > .init.text:kirin_add_pcie_port()
> > The function kirin_pcie_probe() references
> > the function __init kirin_add_pcie_port().
> > This is often because kirin_pcie_probe lacks a __init
> > annotation or the annotation of kirin_add_pcie_port is wrong.
> >
> > Add the __init annotation to both kirin_pcie_probe and
> > kirin_pcie_add_msi then use builtin_platform_driver_probe
> > instead of builtin_platform_driver + .probe to avoid a section
> > mismatch warning with kirin_pcie_driver.
> >
> > Fixes: fc5165db245a ("PCI: kirin: Add HiSilicon Kirin SoC PCIe controller driver")
> > Reported-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> > Suggested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v1 -> v2:
> >
> > Instead of removing the annotation on kirin_add_pcie_port, add it to
> > kirin_pcie_add_msi and kirin_pcie_probe. To avoid a warning with this
> > configuration, use builtin_platform_driver_probe.
> >
> > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c | 9 ++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> > index 5352e0c3be82..f64fed12de51 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-kirin.c
> > @@ -448,8 +448,8 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops kirin_pcie_host_ops = {
> > .host_init = kirin_pcie_host_init,
> > };
> >
> > -static int kirin_pcie_add_msi(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> > - struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int __init kirin_pcie_add_msi(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> > + struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > int irq;
> >
> > @@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ static int __init kirin_add_pcie_port(struct dw_pcie *pci,
> > return dw_pcie_host_init(&pci->pp);
> > }
> >
> > -static int kirin_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int __init kirin_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > {
> > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > struct kirin_pcie *kirin_pcie;
> > @@ -533,11 +533,10 @@ static const struct of_device_id kirin_pcie_match[] = {
> > };
> >
> > static struct platform_driver kirin_pcie_driver = {
> > - .probe = kirin_pcie_probe,
> > .driver = {
> > .name = "kirin-pcie",
> > .of_match_table = kirin_pcie_match,
> > .suppress_bind_attrs = true,
> > },
> > };
> > -builtin_platform_driver(kirin_pcie_driver);
> > +builtin_platform_driver_probe(kirin_pcie_driver, kirin_pcie_probe);
>
> It would be good to get additional review from someone who knows more
> about driver callback lifecycles, but I think this is the correct fix.
> Thanks Nathan.
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

AFAICS we can't use builtin_platform_driver_probe() if the probe()
itself may need deferral (and I *reckon* it may need that, see eg
clk_get()) so I suspect we have to go back to v1 for the patch,
apologies if so.

Lorenzo

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-09-20 12:59    [W:0.152 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site