Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [RFC 00/60] Coscheduling for Linux | From | Rik van Riel <> | Date | Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:40:21 -0400 |
| |
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 18:25 +0200, Jan H. Schönherr wrote: > On 09/14/2018 01:12 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 11:39:47PM +0200, Jan H. Schönherr wrote: > > > > > > B) Why would I want this? > > > In the L1TF context, it prevents other applications from > > > loading > > > additional data into the L1 cache, while one application tries > > > to leak > > > data. > > > > That is the whole and only reason you did this; > > It really isn't. But as your mind seems made up, I'm not going to > bother > to argue.
What are the other use cases, and what kind of performance numbers do you have to show examples of workloads where coscheduling provides a performance benefit?
-- All Rights Reversed. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |