lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH v2 2/2] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: avoid redundant CMD_SYNCs if possible
Date
More than two CMD_SYNCs maybe adjacent in the command queue, and the first
one has done what others want to do. Drop the redundant CMD_SYNCs can
improve IO performance especially under the pressure scene.

I did the statistics in my test environment, the number of CMD_SYNCs can
be reduced about 1/3. See below:
CMD_SYNCs reduced: 19542181
CMD_SYNCs total: 58098548 (include reduced)
CMDs total: 116197099 (TLBI:SYNC about 1:1)

Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index d17a9a7..b96d2d2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
int gerr_irq;
int combined_irq;
u32 sync_nr;
+ u8 prev_cmd_opcode;

unsigned long ias; /* IPA */
unsigned long oas; /* PA */
@@ -775,6 +776,11 @@ static int queue_remove_raw(struct arm_smmu_queue *q, u64 *ent)
return 0;
}

+static inline u8 arm_smmu_cmd_opcode_get(u64 *cmd)
+{
+ return cmd[0] & CMDQ_0_OP;
+}
+
/* High-level queue accessors */
static int arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(u64 *cmd, struct arm_smmu_cmdq_ent *ent)
{
@@ -900,6 +906,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64 *cmd)
struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->cmdq.q;
bool wfe = !!(smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_SEV);

+ smmu->prev_cmd_opcode = arm_smmu_cmd_opcode_get(cmd);
+
while (queue_insert_raw(q, cmd) == -ENOSPC) {
if (queue_poll_cons(q, false, wfe))
dev_err_ratelimited(smmu->dev, "CMDQ timeout\n");
@@ -952,9 +960,17 @@ static int __arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_sync_msi(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
};

spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);
- ent.sync.msidata = ++smmu->sync_nr;
- arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, &ent);
- arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
+ if (smmu->prev_cmd_opcode == CMDQ_OP_CMD_SYNC) {
+ /*
+ * Previous command is CMD_SYNC also, there is no need to add
+ * one more. Just poll it.
+ */
+ ent.sync.msidata = smmu->sync_nr;
+ } else {
+ ent.sync.msidata = ++smmu->sync_nr;
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_build_cmd(cmd, &ent);
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_insert_cmd(smmu, cmd);
+ }
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smmu->cmdq.lock, flags);

return __arm_smmu_sync_poll_msi(smmu, ent.sync.msidata);
--
1.8.3

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-09 13:50    [W:0.030 / U:55.184 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site