Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 6 Aug 2018 12:34:26 +0100 | From | Mark Brown <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 11/11] ASoC: wm8994: Mark expected switch fall-through |
| |
On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 01:55:18PM -0400, valdis.kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 03 Aug 2018 11:56:12 -0500, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" said: > > On 08/03/2018 11:45 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > > > Basically nobody ever uses OPCLK so I'd be susprised if anyone ever > > > noticed.
> I wonder if nobody uses it because any attempts to do so get an error? :)
No, nobody ever physically wires up an OPCLK. If one was there it'd be unavoidable.
> > I see. I wonder what's the best approach in this case. Should that code be > > removed instead of 'fixed'?
> I'm thinking that's a spot that needs a 'break;' added.
Yes. [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |