lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the m68k tree
On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

> Hi Stephen,
>
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:42 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > [forgot the conflict resolution ...]
> >
> > On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 09:27:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the powerpc tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 5b9bfb8ec467 ("m68k: mac: Use time64_t in RTC handling")
> > >
> > > from the m68k tree and commit:
> > >
> > > ebd722275f9c ("macintosh/via-pmu: Replace via-pmu68k driver with via-pmu driver")
> > >
> > > from the powerpc tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your
> > > tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise
> > > any particularly complex conflicts.
>
> Ah, now I remember Finn said he was going to rebase his series once the
> time64_t patch has entered my tree...
>

The conflict I was worried about was avoided when I dropped v3 patch 10/12
("macintosh: Use common code to access RTC"). I'll rework that patch after
all the PMU and RTC work makes its way into Linus' tree.

> > --- a/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
> > +++ b/arch/m68k/mac/misc.c
> > @@@ -90,11 -85,11 +90,11 @@@ static void cuda_write_pram(int offset
> > }
> > #endif /* CONFIG_ADB_CUDA */
> >
> > - #ifdef CONFIG_ADB_PMU68K
> > + #ifdef CONFIG_ADB_PMU
> > -static long pmu_read_time(void)
> > +static time64_t pmu_read_time(void)
> > {
> > struct adb_request req;
> > - long time;
> > + time64_t time;
> >
> > if (pmu_request(&req, NULL, 1, PMU_READ_RTC) < 0)
> > return 0;
>
> Thanks, looks good to me!
>

Looks good to me, too.

Thanks.

--

> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
> Geert
>
>

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-04 14:25    [W:0.044 / U:3.252 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site