lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Subject[PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/17] rcutorture: Reduce priority of forward-progress testing
Date
On !SMP tests, the forward-progress kthread might prevent RCU's
grace-period kthread from running, which would defeat RCU's
forward-progress measures. On PREEMPT tests without RCU priority
boosting, the forward-progress kthread might preempt a reader for an
extended time period, which would also defeat RCU's forward-progress
measures. This commit therefore reduced rcutorture's forward-progress
kthread's priority in those cases.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 9622192ec5c9..ac487ea8d245 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -1710,6 +1710,8 @@ static int rcu_torture_fwd_prog(void *args)
static DEFINE_TORTURE_RANDOM(trs);

VERBOSE_TOROUT_STRING("rcu_torture_fwd_progress task started");
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP) || !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_BOOST))
+ set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE);
if (cur_ops->call && cur_ops->sync && cur_ops->cb_barrier) {
init_rcu_head_on_stack(&fcs.rh);
cur_ops->call(&fcs.rh, rcu_torture_fwd_prog_cb);
--
2.17.1
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-29 23:50    [W:0.079 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site