lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 02/17] zinc: introduce minimal cryptography library
> It seems you still don't explicitly clarify anywhere in the source itself that
> the copyright holders of the code from OpenSSL have relicensed it under GPLv2.
> I only see a GPLv2 license slapped on the files, yet no such license is presence
> in the OpenSSL originals, at least in the one I checked. If you did receive
> explicit permission, then you should include an explicit clarification in each
> file like the one in arch/arm/crypto/sha1-armv4-large.S.

Better yet, get the copyright holders to publicly send a
signed-off-by: or acked-by: so it is clear they agree to this.

Andrew

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-25 18:16    [W:0.983 / U:0.132 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site