Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest what to do on systems with too much RAM | From | Vlastimil Babka <> | Date | Fri, 24 Aug 2018 09:32:00 +0200 |
| |
On 08/23/2018 09:27 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Thu 23-08-18 16:28:12, Vlastimil Babka wrote: >> Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system >> with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. Let's >> make the warning more helpful by suggesting the proper mem=X kernel boot param, >> a rough calculation of how much RAM can be lost (not precise if there's holes >> between MAX_PA/2 and max_pfn in the e820 map) and a link to the L1TF document >> to help decide if the mitigation is worth the unusable RAM. >> >> [1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105536 >> >> Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> >> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org >> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> > > I wouldn't bother with max_pfn-half_pa part but other than that this is > much more useful than the original message.
Right, and it causes build failures on some configs.
> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Thanks! Here's a v2:
----8<---- From 977c5db27fe35a84807850b947bc5678c4d467b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:21:29 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] x86/speculation/l1tf: suggest what to do on systems with too much RAM
Two users have reported [1] that they have an "extremely unlikely" system with more than MAX_PA/2 memory and L1TF mitigation is not effective. Let's make the warning more helpful by suggesting the proper mem=X kernel boot param to make it effective and a link to the L1TF document to help decide if the mitigation is worth the unusable RAM.
[1] https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1105536
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index cb4a16292aa7..5c32b5006738 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -702,6 +702,10 @@ static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void) half_pa = (u64)l1tf_pfn_limit() << PAGE_SHIFT; if (e820__mapped_any(half_pa, ULLONG_MAX - half_pa, E820_TYPE_RAM)) { pr_warn("System has more than MAX_PA/2 memory. L1TF mitigation not effective.\n"); + pr_info("You may make it effective by booting the kernel with mem=%llu parameter.\n", + half_pa); + pr_info("However, doing so will make a part of your RAM unusable.\n"); + pr_info("Reading Documentation/admin-guide/l1tf.rst might help you decide.\n"); return; } -- 2.18.0
| |