lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] selinux: refactor mls_context_to_sid() and make it stricter
On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 4:07 AM Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 9:56 PM Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 6, 2018 at 5:19 PM Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > The intended behavior change for this patch is to reject any MLS strings
> > > that contain (trailing) garbage if p->mls_enabled is true.
> > >
> > > As suggested by Paul Moore, change mls_context_to_sid() so that the two
> > > parts of the range are extracted before the rest of the parsing. Because
> > > now we don't have to scan for two different separators simultaneously
> > > everywhere, we can actually switch to strchr() everywhere instead of the
> > > open-coded loops that scan for two separators at once.
> > >
> > > mls_context_to_sid() used to signal how much of the input string was parsed
> > > by updating `*scontext`. However, there is actually no case in which
> > > mls_context_to_sid() only parses a subset of the input and still returns
> > > a success (other than the buggy case with a second '-' in which it
> > > incorrectly claims to have consumed the entire string). Turn `scontext`
> > > into a simple pointer argument and stop redundantly checking whether the
> > > entire input was consumed in string_to_context_struct(). This also lets us
> > > remove the `scontext_len` argument from `string_to_context_struct()`.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> > > ---
> > > Refactored version of
> > > "[PATCH] selinux: stricter parsing in mls_context_to_sid()" based on
> > > Paul's comments. WDYT?
> > > I've thrown some inputs at it, and it seems to work.
> > >
> > > security/selinux/ss/mls.c | 178 ++++++++++++++-------------------
> > > security/selinux/ss/mls.h | 2 +-
> > > security/selinux/ss/services.c | 12 +--
> > > 3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 110 deletions(-)
> >
> > Thanks for the rework, this looks much better than what we currently
> > have. I have some comments/questions below ...
> >
> > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/mls.c b/security/selinux/ss/mls.c
> > > index 39475fb455bc..2fe459df3c85 100644
> > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/mls.c
> > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/mls.c
> > > @@ -218,9 +218,7 @@ int mls_context_isvalid(struct policydb *p, struct context *c)
> > > /*
> > > * Set the MLS fields in the security context structure
> > > * `context' based on the string representation in
> > > - * the string `*scontext'. Update `*scontext' to
> > > - * point to the end of the string representation of
> > > - * the MLS fields.
> > > + * the string `scontext'.
> > > *
> > > * This function modifies the string in place, inserting
> > > * NULL characters to terminate the MLS fields.
> > > @@ -235,22 +233,21 @@ int mls_context_isvalid(struct policydb *p, struct context *c)
> > > */
> > > int mls_context_to_sid(struct policydb *pol,
> > > char oldc,
> > > - char **scontext,
> > > + char *scontext,
> > > struct context *context,
> > > struct sidtab *s,
> > > u32 def_sid)
> > > {
> > > -
> > > - char delim;
> > > - char *scontextp, *p, *rngptr;
> > > + char *sensitivity, *cur_cat, *next_cat, *rngptr;
> > > struct level_datum *levdatum;
> > > struct cat_datum *catdatum, *rngdatum;
> > > - int l, rc = -EINVAL;
> > > + int l, rc, i;
> > > + char *rangep[2];
> > >
> > > if (!pol->mls_enabled) {
> > > - if (def_sid != SECSID_NULL && oldc)
> > > - *scontext += strlen(*scontext) + 1;
> > > - return 0;
> > > + if ((def_sid != SECSID_NULL && oldc) || (*scontext) == '\0')
> > > + return 0;
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> >
> > Why are we simply not always return 0 in the case where MLS is not
> > enabled in the policy? The mls_context_to_sid() is pretty much a
> > no-op in this case (even more so with your pat regardless of input and
> > I worry that returning EINVAL here is a deviation from current
> > behavior which could cause problems.
>
> Sorry, I was rephrasing the text above when I accidentally hit send.
> While my emails are generally a good source of typos, the above is
> pretty bad, so let me try again ...
>
> Why are we simply not always returning 0 in the case where MLS is not
> enabled in the policy? The mls_context_to_sid() function is pretty
> much a no-op in this case regardless of input and I worry that
> returning EINVAL here is a deviation from current behavior which could
> cause problems.

Reverse call graph of mls_context_to_sid():

mls_context_to_sid()
mls_from_string()
selinux_audit_rule_init()
[...]
string_to_context_struct()
security_context_to_sid_core()
[...]
convert_context()
[...]

string_to_context_struct() currently has the following code:

rc = mls_context_to_sid(pol, oldc, &p, ctx, sidtabp, def_sid);
if (rc)
goto out;

rc = -EINVAL;
if ((p - scontext) < scontext_len)
goto out;

In my patch, I tried to preserve the behavior of
string_to_context_struct(), at the expense of slightly changing the
behavior of selinux_audit_rule_init().

But if you think that's a bad idea or unnecessary, say so and I'll change it.

> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -261,113 +258,94 @@ int mls_context_to_sid(struct policydb *pol,
> > > struct context *defcon;
> > >
> > > if (def_sid == SECSID_NULL)
> > > - goto out;
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > defcon = sidtab_search(s, def_sid);
> > > if (!defcon)
> > > - goto out;
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - rc = mls_context_cpy(context, defcon);
> > > - goto out;
> > > + return mls_context_cpy(context, defcon);
> > > }
> > >
> > > - /* Extract low sensitivity. */
> > > - scontextp = p = *scontext;
> > > - while (*p && *p != ':' && *p != '-')
> > > - p++;
> > > -
> > > - delim = *p;
> > > - if (delim != '\0')
> > > - *p++ = '\0';
> > > + /*
> > > + * If we're dealing with a range, figure out where the two parts
> > > + * of the range begin.
> > > + */
> > > + rangep[0] = scontext;
> > > + rangep[1] = strchr(scontext, '-');
> > > + if (rangep[1]) {
> > > + rangep[1][0] = '\0';
> > > + rangep[1]++;
> > > + }
> > >
> > > + /* For each part of the range: */
> > > for (l = 0; l < 2; l++) {
> > > - levdatum = hashtab_search(pol->p_levels.table, scontextp);
> > > - if (!levdatum) {
> > > - rc = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > + /* Split sensitivity and category set. */
> > > + sensitivity = rangep[l];
> > > + if (sensitivity == NULL)
> > > + break;
> > > + next_cat = strchr(sensitivity, ':');
> > > + if (next_cat)
> > > + *(next_cat++) = '\0';
> > >
> > > + /* Parse sensitivity. */
> > > + levdatum = hashtab_search(pol->p_levels.table, sensitivity);
> > > + if (!levdatum)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > context->range.level[l].sens = levdatum->level->sens;
> > >
> > > - if (delim == ':') {
> > > - /* Extract category set. */
> > > - while (1) {
> > > - scontextp = p;
> > > - while (*p && *p != ',' && *p != '-')
> > > - p++;
> > > - delim = *p;
> > > - if (delim != '\0')
> > > - *p++ = '\0';
> > > -
> > > - /* Separate into range if exists */
> > > - rngptr = strchr(scontextp, '.');
> > > - if (rngptr != NULL) {
> > > - /* Remove '.' */
> > > - *rngptr++ = '\0';
> > > - }
> > > + /* Extract category set. */
> > > + while (next_cat != NULL) {
> > > + cur_cat = next_cat;
> > > + next_cat = strchr(next_cat, ',');
> > > + if (next_cat != NULL)
> > > + *(next_cat++) = '\0';
> > > +
> > > + /* Separate into range if exists */
> > > + rngptr = strchr(cur_cat, '.');
> > > + if (rngptr != NULL) {
> > > + /* Remove '.' */
> >
> > On the chance you need to respin this patch, you can probably get rid
> > of the above comment and the if-body braces; we don't have "Remove X"
> > comments in other similar places in this function.
> >
> > > + *rngptr++ = '\0';
> > > + }
> > >
> > > - catdatum = hashtab_search(pol->p_cats.table,
> > > - scontextp);
> > > - if (!catdatum) {
> > > - rc = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > + catdatum = hashtab_search(pol->p_cats.table, cur_cat);
> > > + if (!catdatum)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - rc = ebitmap_set_bit(&context->range.level[l].cat,
> > > - catdatum->value - 1, 1);
> > > - if (rc)
> > > - goto out;
> > > -
> > > - /* If range, set all categories in range */
> > > - if (rngptr) {
> > > - int i;
> > > -
> > > - rngdatum = hashtab_search(pol->p_cats.table, rngptr);
> > > - if (!rngdatum) {
> > > - rc = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (catdatum->value >= rngdatum->value) {
> > > - rc = -EINVAL;
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - for (i = catdatum->value; i < rngdatum->value; i++) {
> > > - rc = ebitmap_set_bit(&context->range.level[l].cat, i, 1);
> > > - if (rc)
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > + rc = ebitmap_set_bit(&context->range.level[l].cat,
> > > + catdatum->value - 1, 1);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + return rc;
> > > +
> > > + /* If range, set all categories in range */
> > > + if (rngptr == NULL)
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + rngdatum = hashtab_search(pol->p_cats.table, rngptr);
> > > + if (!rngdatum)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (catdatum->value >= rngdatum->value)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - if (delim != ',')
> > > - break;
> > > + for (i = catdatum->value; i < rngdatum->value; i++) {
> > > + rc = ebitmap_set_bit(&context->range.level[l].cat, i, 1);
> > > + if (rc)
> > > + return rc;
> > > }
> > > }
> > > - if (delim == '-') {
> > > - /* Extract high sensitivity. */
> > > - scontextp = p;
> > > - while (*p && *p != ':')
> > > - p++;
> > > -
> > > - delim = *p;
> > > - if (delim != '\0')
> > > - *p++ = '\0';
> > > - } else
> > > - break;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - if (l == 0) {
> > > + /* If we didn't see a '-', the range start is also the range end. */
> > > + if (rangep[1] == NULL) {
> > > context->range.level[1].sens = context->range.level[0].sens;
> > > rc = ebitmap_cpy(&context->range.level[1].cat,
> > > &context->range.level[0].cat);
> > > if (rc)
> > > - goto out;
> > > + return rc;
> > > }
> > > - *scontext = ++p;
> > > - rc = 0;
> > > -out:
> > > - return rc;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > In the case where we have a MLS policy loaded (pol->mls_enabled != 0)
> > and scontext is empty (scontext[0] = '\0'), we could end up returning
> > 0 couldn't we? It seems like we might want a quick check for this
> > before we parse the low/high portions of the field into the rangep
> > array.
> >
> > > }
> > >
> > > /*
> > > @@ -379,21 +357,19 @@ int mls_context_to_sid(struct policydb *pol,
> > > int mls_from_string(struct policydb *p, char *str, struct context *context,
> > > gfp_t gfp_mask)
> > > {
> > > - char *tmpstr, *freestr;
> > > + char *tmpstr;
> > > int rc;
> > >
> > > if (!p->mls_enabled)
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > >
> > > - /* we need freestr because mls_context_to_sid will change
> > > - the value of tmpstr */
> > > - tmpstr = freestr = kstrdup(str, gfp_mask);
> > > + tmpstr = kstrdup(str, gfp_mask);
> > > if (!tmpstr) {
> > > rc = -ENOMEM;
> > > } else {
> > > - rc = mls_context_to_sid(p, ':', &tmpstr, context,
> > > + rc = mls_context_to_sid(p, ':', tmpstr, context,
> > > NULL, SECSID_NULL);
> > > - kfree(freestr);
> > > + kfree(tmpstr);
> > > }
> > >
> > > return rc;
> > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/mls.h b/security/selinux/ss/mls.h
> > > index 9a3ff7af70ad..67093647576d 100644
> > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/mls.h
> > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/mls.h
> > > @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ int mls_level_isvalid(struct policydb *p, struct mls_level *l);
> > >
> > > int mls_context_to_sid(struct policydb *p,
> > > char oldc,
> > > - char **scontext,
> > > + char *scontext,
> > > struct context *context,
> > > struct sidtab *s,
> > > u32 def_sid);
> > > diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> > > index dd2ceec06fef..9212d4dd817a 100644
> > > --- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> > > +++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c
> > > @@ -1367,7 +1367,6 @@ int security_sid_to_context_force(struct selinux_state *state, u32 sid,
> > > static int string_to_context_struct(struct policydb *pol,
> > > struct sidtab *sidtabp,
> > > char *scontext,
> > > - u32 scontext_len,
> > > struct context *ctx,
> > > u32 def_sid)
> > > {
> > > @@ -1428,15 +1427,12 @@ static int string_to_context_struct(struct policydb *pol,
> > >
> > > ctx->type = typdatum->value;
> > >
> > > - rc = mls_context_to_sid(pol, oldc, &p, ctx, sidtabp, def_sid);
> > > + rc = mls_context_to_sid(pol, oldc, p, ctx, sidtabp, def_sid);
> > > if (rc)
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > - rc = -EINVAL;
> > > - if ((p - scontext) < scontext_len)
> > > - goto out;
> > > -
> > > /* Check the validity of the new context. */
> > > + rc = -EINVAL;
> > > if (!policydb_context_isvalid(pol, ctx))
> > > goto out;
> > > rc = 0;
> > > @@ -1491,7 +1487,7 @@ static int security_context_to_sid_core(struct selinux_state *state,
> > > policydb = &state->ss->policydb;
> > > sidtab = &state->ss->sidtab;
> > > rc = string_to_context_struct(policydb, sidtab, scontext2,
> > > - scontext_len, &context, def_sid);
> > > + &context, def_sid);
> > > if (rc == -EINVAL && force) {
> > > context.str = str;
> > > context.len = strlen(str) + 1;
> > > @@ -1959,7 +1955,7 @@ static int convert_context(u32 key,
> > > goto out;
> > >
> > > rc = string_to_context_struct(args->newp, NULL, s,
> > > - c->len, &ctx, SECSID_NULL);
> > > + &ctx, SECSID_NULL);
> > > kfree(s);
> > > if (!rc) {
> > > printk(KERN_INFO "SELinux: Context %s became valid (mapped).\n",
> > > --
> > > 2.18.0.597.ga71716f1ad-goog
> >
> > --
> > paul moore
> > www.paul-moore.com
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
>
>
> --
> paul moore
> security @ redhat

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-11 01:02    [W:0.079 / U:3.360 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site