lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 04/10] x86/paravirt: use a single ops structure
From
Date
On 10/08/18 14:06, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 10.08.18 at 13:52, <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>> --- a/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/hyperv/mmu.c
>> @@ -228,9 +228,9 @@ void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void)
>>
>> if (!(ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_EX_PROCESSOR_MASKS_RECOMMENDED)) {
>> pr_info("Using hypercall for remote TLB flush\n");
>> - pv_mmu_ops.flush_tlb_others = hyperv_flush_tlb_others;
>> + pv_ops.pv_mmu_ops.flush_tlb_others = hyperv_flush_tlb_others;
>
> Taking just this as example, why not
>
> pv_ops.mmu.flush_tlb_others = hyperv_flush_tlb_others;
>
> ? Both pv_ and _ops are redundant on the field names.

Good idea.


Juergen

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-10 14:31    [W:0.029 / U:30.708 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site