[lkml]   [2018]   [Aug]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5 10/14] sched/cpufreq: Refactor the utilization aggregation method
On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 9:31 PM,  <> wrote:
> On 2018-07-31 00:59, Quentin Perret wrote:
>> On Monday 30 Jul 2018 at 12:35:27 (-0700), wrote:
>> [...]
>>> If it's going to be a different aggregation from what's done for
>>> frequency
>>> guidance, I don't see the point of having this inside schedutil. Why not
>>> keep it inside the scheduler files?
>> This code basically results from a discussion we had with Peter on v4.
>> Keeping everything centralized can make sense from a maintenance
>> perspective, I think. That makes it easy to see the impact of any change
>> to utilization signals for both EAS and schedutil.
> In that case, I'd argue it makes more sense to keep the code centralized in
> the scheduler. The scheduler can let schedutil know about the utilization
> after it aggregates them. There's no need for a cpufreq governor to know
> that there are scheduling classes or how many there are. And the scheduler
> can then choose to aggregate one way for task packing and another way for
> frequency guidance.

Also the aggregate utilization may be used by cpuidle governors in
principle to decide how deep they can go with idle state selection.

 \ /
  Last update: 2018-08-01 09:33    [W:0.088 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site