Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:13:52 +0530 | From | Balakrishna Godavarthi <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v11 7/7] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Add support for Qualcomm Bluetooth chip wcn3990 |
| |
Hi Matthias,
On 2018-07-31 02:25, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 07:43:20PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote: >> From: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org> >> >> Add support to set voltage/current of various regulators >> to power up/down Bluetooth chip wcn3990. >> >> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> Changes in v11: >> * removed support to read regulator currents from dts. >> * updated review comments. > > Updated regulator voltage ranges? > >> +static int qca_wcn3990_init(struct hci_uart *hu, u32 *soc_ver) >> +{ >> + struct hci_dev *hdev = hu->hdev; >> + int i, ret; >> + >> + /* wcn3990 is a discrete Bluetooth chip connected to SoC. >> + * sometimes we will face communication synchronization issues, >> + * like reading version command timeouts. In which HCI_SETUP fails, >> + * to overcome these issues, we try to communicate by performing an >> + * cold power off and on. >> + */ >> + for (i = 0; i <= 3; i++) { >> + ret = qca_power_setup(hu, true); >> + if (ret) >> + goto regs_off; >> + >> + /* Forcefully enable wcn3990 to enter in to boot mode. */ >> + host_set_baudrate(hu, 2400); >> + ret = qca_send_power_pulse(hdev, QCA_WCN3990_POWEROFF_PULSE); >> + if (ret) >> + goto regs_off; >> + >> + qca_set_speed(hu, QCA_INIT_SPEED); >> + ret = qca_send_power_pulse(hdev, QCA_WCN3990_POWERON_PULSE); >> + if (ret) >> + goto regs_off; >> + >> + /* Wait for 100 ms for SoC to boot */ >> + msleep(100); >> + >> + /* Now the device is in ready state to communicate with host. >> + * To sync host with device we need to reopen port. >> + * Without this, we will have RTS and CTS synchronization >> + * issues. >> + */ >> + serdev_device_close(hu->serdev); >> + ret = serdev_device_open(hu->serdev); >> + if (ret) { >> + bt_dev_err(hu->hdev, "failed to open port"); >> + break; >> + } >> + >> + hci_uart_set_flow_control(hu, false); >> + ret = qca_read_soc_version(hdev, soc_ver); >> + >> + if (!ret) >> + break; >> + >> +regs_off: >> + bt_dev_err(hdev, "retrying to establish communication: %d", >> + i + 1); >> + qca_power_shutdown(hdev); >> + } >> + >> + return ret; >> +} > > I'm still not convinced that the retry loop is needed/desirable, I > commented on the discussion on v10. > [Bala] : replied on v10 patch.
>> +static const struct qca_vreg_data qca_soc_data = { >> + .soc_type = QCA_WCN3990, >> + .vregs = (struct qca_vreg []) { >> + { "vddio", 1800000, 1900000, 15000 }, >> + { "vddxo", 1800000, 1900000, 80000 }, >> + { "vddrf", 1300000, 1350000, 300000 }, >> + { "vddch0", 3300000, 3400000, 450000 }, >> + }, > > In v10 this was: > > { "vddio", 1800000, 1800000, 15000 }, > { "vddxo", 1800000, 1800000, 80000 }, > { "vddrf", 1304000, 1304000, 300000 }, > { "vddch0", 3000000, 3312000, 450000 }, > > I don't have concerns about the new voltage ranges, but you should > mention such changes in the changelog, ideally with a brief > description why the change was made.
[Bala]: I missed to add, I just updated with latest values from datasheet.
-- Regards Balakrishna.
| |