Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:57:06 +0200 | From | Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH RT v2] arm64: fpsimd: use a local_lock() in addition to local_bh_disable() |
| |
On 2018-07-24 09:46:23 [-0400], Steven Rostedt wrote: > > Unfortunately yes. > > Then we need to find another solution, because this is way too ugly and > as Dave said, fragile to keep.
Yes. I have something new where Mike said it works (while this causes Mike's gcc to segfault). Need to test this myself…
> How does local_lock_bh() do a +3 (not seeing it in the code). And
get_local_var() +1 spin_lock_bh() +2 because local_bh_disable() +1 spin_lock() +1
Sebastian
| |