Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 23 Jul 2018 08:29:56 -0500 | From | Nishanth Menon <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH V2 0/6] mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Add support for AM654 Secure Proxy |
| |
On 18:06-20180716, Nishanth Menon wrote: > The V2 of the series updates a minor comment in binding and picks up Rob's Reviewed-by > > Since I have'nt seen additional comments, I am assuming things are fine for v4.19. > > The following series enables support for Secure Proxy in newest addition in TI's SoC > portfolio - AM654 SoC (posted previously as RFC). > > The series is based on v4.18-rc1 and is available here: > https://github.com/nmenon/linux-2.6-playground/commits/upstream/v4.18-rc1/k3-1-am6-sproxy > > There are a couple of follow on patches to be posted as well (Kconfig changes > for K3_ARCH and actual dts node changes). > > Changes since RFC are highlighted in each of the patches, but overall: > * The K3 dependency has been broken out into a seperate series independent of > this. > * Binding has been seperated out as it's own file (even though the driver is > reused). > > Consolidated all patches (including all series) are available here: > https://github.com/nmenon/linux-2.6-playground/commits/upstream/v4.18-rc1/k3-am6-integ > > Full Boot log on AM654 (integrated with all patch series) is available here: > https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/bBFmnzYtCd/ > > Nishanth Menon (6): > mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Get rid of unused structure members > mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Allocate Rx channel resources only on request > mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Change message count mask to be descriptor based > mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Move the memory region name to descriptor > dt-bindings: mailbox: Add support for secure proxy threads > mailbox: ti-msgmgr: Add support for Secure Proxy > > .../bindings/mailbox/ti,secure-proxy.txt | 50 +++ > drivers/mailbox/ti-msgmgr.c | 353 +++++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 336 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/ti,secure-proxy.txt
Jassi,
I dont see this in next-20180723. You'd asked me to hold off on pings https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/16/353 -> so, held off as much as I could before wondering on the status.
-- Regards, Nishanth Menon
| |