lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Sphinx version dependencies?
    From
    Date
    Am Freitag, den 20.07.2018, 09:44 -0700 schrieb Darrick J. Wong:
    > and now I'm just confused since 16.04 has the same version of docutils
    > and an older sphinx and runs fine; but 18.04 has newer docutils and
    > newer sphinx and runs fine.

    Same here .. I'am completely confused by distros etc. .. I will never be able to
    control that. Thats why I recommend the virtualenv workflow (as I wrote Christoph):

    $ sudo apt install python3-virtualenv

    To setup up a environment for building htmldocs:

    $ python3 -m virtualenv py3env
    $ ./py3env/bin/pip install -r ./Documentation/sphinx/requirements.txt

    To build htmldocs with:

    $ SPHINXBUILD=./py3env/bin/sphinx-build make htmldocs

    If the env is no longer needed:

    $ rm -r py3env

    Am Freitag, den 20.07.2018, 09:44 -0700 schrieb Darrick J. Wong:
    > Yes. This makes writing broadly portable markup difficult -- originally
    > I did not take the '=' all the way to the right edge of the table
    > because I saw that last example in the above document and assumed that
    > it wasn't necessary to extend the '=' all the way to the right edge.
    > Neither Ubuntu system choked on it, so is this a bug in upstream? Some
    > strange patch added by the distro? Something that ended up in the
    > python wheel? Or a bug in the spec?

    I guess in the version history of docutils ;) .. use workflow above to escape
    from distro chaos. Even missing '=' will be OK.

    -- Markus --

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2018-07-20 18:59    [W:2.536 / U:0.072 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site