lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv5 08/19] x86/mm: Introduce variables to store number, shift and mask of KeyIDs
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 02:37:35PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 04:19:10PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > > > > } else {
> > > > > /*
> > > > > * Reset __PHYSICAL_MASK.
> > > > > @@ -591,6 +592,9 @@ static void detect_tme(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > > > > * between CPUs.
> > > > > */
> > > > > physical_mask = (1ULL << __PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1;
> > > > > + mktme_keyid_mask = 0;
> > > > > + mktme_keyid_shift = 0;
> > > > > + mktme_nr_keyids = 0;
> > > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Should be unnecessary. These are zeroed by the compiler.
> > >
> > > No. detect_tme() called for each CPU in the system.
> >
> > And then the variables are cleared out while other CPUs can access them?
> > How is that supposed to work?
>
> This code path only matter in patalogical case: when MKTME configuation is
> inconsitent between CPUs. Basically if BIOS screwed things up we disable
> MKTME.

I still don't see how that's supposed to work.

When the inconsistent CPU is brought up _AFTER_ MKTME is enabled, then how
does clearing the variables help? It does not magically make all the other
stuff go away.

Thanks,

tglx


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-19 15:19    [W:0.124 / U:0.844 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site