lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 4/5] mtd: rawnand: qcom: update BBT related flags
Abhishek,

Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018
23:41:44 +0200:

> Hi Boris,
>
> Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> wrote on Wed, 18 Jul 2018
> 23:36:37 +0200:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 23:15:26 +0200
> > Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Abhishek,
> > >
> > > Abhishek Sahu <absahu@codeaurora.org> wrote on Fri, 6 Jul 2018
> > > 13:21:58 +0530:
> > >
> > > > Remove the NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN to use RAM based BBT.
> > >
> > > Unless I am understanding it the wrong way, NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN will skip
> > > the scan of the on-chip BBT and will scan every block to construct a
> > > RAM, based BBT thanks to the BBM.
> > >
> > > So flash based BBT is already unused and removing this flag is a
> > > mistake, right?
> >
> > ->scan_bbt() is also taking care of building the in-RAM BBT based on
> > BBM when no on-flash BBT is provided, so I think it's the right thing
> > to do.
>
> Oh right. Then doing so is harmless.

Could you please update the commit log to reflect this aspect?

>
> Thanks for the clarification.
> Miquèl

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-18 23:43    [W:0.056 / U:0.152 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site