Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 18 Jul 2018 13:29:55 +1000 | From | Stephen Rothwell <> | Subject | Re: vfs / overlayfs conflict resolution for linux-next |
| |
Hi Al,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0100 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote: > > ... and now it even builds. Said that, I would really like to hear something > from you - I can duplicate the entire overlayfs-next and merge it into > my #for-next and ask Steven to use that instead of your tree, but I very > much dislike going over your head like that. > > I realize that you'd been away for a while and probably are digging yourself > from under the piles of mail, but it's getting late in the cycle and I want > to get #for-next into reasonably sane shape. Please, look through that > thing and respond.
Almost everything has been removed from the overlayfs tree in linux-next today. The only commit there currently is:
67810693077a ovl: fix wrong use of impure dir cache in ovl_iterate() -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |