lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: vfs / overlayfs conflict resolution for linux-next
Hi Al,

On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0100 Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> ... and now it even builds. Said that, I would really like to hear something
> from you - I can duplicate the entire overlayfs-next and merge it into
> my #for-next and ask Steven to use that instead of your tree, but I very
> much dislike going over your head like that.
>
> I realize that you'd been away for a while and probably are digging yourself
> from under the piles of mail, but it's getting late in the cycle and I want
> to get #for-next into reasonably sane shape. Please, look through that
> thing and respond.

Almost everything has been removed from the overlayfs tree in
linux-next today. The only commit there currently is:

67810693077a ovl: fix wrong use of impure dir cache in ovl_iterate()
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-18 05:30    [W:0.321 / U:0.156 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site