Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/9] kconfig: include common Kconfig files from top-level Kconfig | From | Randy Dunlap <> | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2018 23:42:54 -0700 |
| |
On 07/16/2018 11:33 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On 07/11/2018 05:21 AM, Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> 2018-07-09 0:19 GMT+09:00 Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>: >>> Instead of duplicating the source statements in every architecture just >>> do it once in the toplevel Kconfig file. >>> >>> Note that with this the inclusion of arch/$(SRCARCH/Kconfig moves out of >>> the top-level Kconfig into arch/Kconfig so that don't violate ordering >>> constraits while keeping a sensible menu structure. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> >> >> >>> diff --git a/arch/sh/Kconfig b/arch/sh/Kconfig >>> index dd4f3d3e644f..7ab7b148181b 100644 >>> --- a/arch/sh/Kconfig >>> +++ b/arch/sh/Kconfig >>> @@ -168,10 +168,6 @@ config PGTABLE_LEVELS >>> default 3 if X2TLB >>> default 2 >>> >>> -source "init/Kconfig" >>> - >>> -source "kernel/Kconfig.freezer" >>> - >>> menu "System type" >>> >>> # >>> @@ -553,8 +549,6 @@ endchoice >>> >>> endif >>> >>> -source "arch/sh/mm/Kconfig" >> >> >> I noticed at least sh is broken >> because "arch/sh/mm/Kconfig" is no longer included by anyone. >> >> I am not doing further tests. >> > > Hi, > > Thanks for noticing that. > > I have tested all $ARCH (except um) with "allmodconfig" and so far, arch/sh/ > is the only one that has a problem. >
Well, there are 3 $ARCH-es that have an arch/$ARCH/mm/Kconfig file: arm, sh, and unicore32.
We can either merge those into arch/$ARCH/Kconfig or we can source arch/$ARCH/mm/Kconfig for all $ARCH (where most of these files will be empty).
Christoph, thoughts/ideas?
> >> >> Please test *ALL* architectures. >> >> If possible, matrix tests (arch, config-target), where >> arch = arm, arm64, ... >> config-target = allyesconfig, allnoconfig, alldefconfig, ... >> >> >> Note: >> scripts/diffconf is helpful. >> > >
-- ~Randy
| |