Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 13 Jul 2018 15:33:58 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 25/27] x86/cet: Add PTRACE interface for CET |
| |
* Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> > > > > to "CET" (which is a well-known acronym for "Central European Time"), > > > > not to CFE? > > > > > > > > > > I don't know if I can change that, will find out. > > > > So what I'd suggest is something pretty simple: to use CFT/cft in kernel internal > > names, except for the Intel feature bit and any MSR enumeration which can be CET > > if Intel named it that way, and a short comment explaining the acronym difference. > > > > Or something like that. > > Actually, I don't think CFT is much better -- there's limited number > of TLAs (*). "ENFORCE_FLOW"? "FLOWE"? "EFLOW"?
Erm, I wanted to say 'CFE', i.e. the abbreviation of 'Control Flow Enforcement'.
But I guess I can live with CET as well ...
Thanks,
Ingo
| |