lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 9/9] iommu/vt-d: Remove the obsolete per iommu pasid tables
From
Date
Hi Peter,

On 07/11/2018 10:45 AM, Peter Xu wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2018 at 01:22:58PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
>> The obsolete per iommu pasid tables are no longer used. Hence,
>> clean up them.
>>
>> Cc: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>> Cc: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 6 +++---
>> drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 17 ++---------------
>> include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 5 ++---
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> index f8609b5..9a88081 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
>> @@ -1755,7 +1755,7 @@ static void free_dmar_iommu(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>> if (pasid_enabled(iommu)) {
>> if (ecap_prs(iommu->ecap))
>> intel_svm_finish_prq(iommu);
>> - intel_svm_free_pasid_tables(iommu);
>> + intel_svm_exit(iommu);
>> }
>> #endif
>> }
>> @@ -3336,7 +3336,7 @@ static int __init init_dmars(void)
>> hw_pass_through = 0;
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>> if (pasid_enabled(iommu))
>> - intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables(iommu);
>> + intel_svm_init(iommu);
>> #endif
>> }
>>
>> @@ -4330,7 +4330,7 @@ static int intel_iommu_add(struct dmar_drhd_unit *dmaru)
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM
>> if (pasid_enabled(iommu))
>> - intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables(iommu);
>> + intel_svm_init(iommu);
>> #endif
>>
>> if (dmaru->ignored) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>> index a253cde..eb30836 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ struct pasid_state_entry {
>> u64 val;
>> };
>>
>> -int intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>> +int intel_svm_init(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>> {
>> struct page *pages;
>> int order;
>> @@ -63,15 +63,6 @@ int intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>> iommu->pasid_max = 0x20000;
>>
>> order = get_order(sizeof(struct pasid_entry) * iommu->pasid_max);
>> - pages = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, order);
>> - if (!pages) {
>> - pr_warn("IOMMU: %s: Failed to allocate PASID table\n",
>> - iommu->name);
>> - return -ENOMEM;
>> - }
>> - iommu->pasid_table = page_address(pages);
>> - pr_info("%s: Allocated order %d PASID table.\n", iommu->name, order);
>> -
>> if (ecap_dis(iommu->ecap)) {
>> /* Just making it explicit... */
>> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct pasid_entry) != sizeof(struct pasid_state_entry));
> Then do we still need the so-called pasid state table? I tried to
> find out what it did before but I failed since I see that the bit 27
> of the extended cap is marked as reserved now in the latest vt-d spec
> (then ecap_dis could be meaningless too).
>
> Asked since if we don't need both the per-iommu pasid table and the
> pasid state table, then maybe we don't need intel_svm_init() at all?
>
>> @@ -86,14 +77,10 @@ int intel_svm_alloc_pasid_tables(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -int intel_svm_free_pasid_tables(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
>> +int intel_svm_exit(struct intel_iommu *iommu)
> Same thing applies to this exit() function - after we removed the
> per-iommu idr, per-iommu pasid table, and (possibly obsolete)
> per-iommu pasid state table, do we need that at all?
>
> Thanks,
>

Good eyes!

Yes, we will cleanup this with a following patch series which enables
features defined in the vt-d v3.0.

Best regards,
Lu Baolu

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-07-11 08:44    [W:0.055 / U:2.300 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site