Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:05:47 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kernel.h: Add for_each_if() |
| |
On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 13:51:08 +0200 Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> wrote:
> But I still have the situation that a bunch of maintainers acked this > and Andrew Morton defacto nacked it, which I guess means I'll keep the > macro in drm? The common way to go about this seems to be to just push > the patch series with the ack in some pull request to Linus and ignore > the people who raised questions, but not really my thing.
Heh.
But, am I wrong? Code which uses regular kernel style doesn't have these issues. We shouldn't be enabling irregular style - we should be making such sites more regular. The fact that the compiler generates a nice warning in some cases simply helps us with that.
| |