[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] mm: don't skip memory guarantee calculations
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 11:03:49AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Mon 04-06-18 17:23:06, Roman Gushchin wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm happy to discuss any concrete issues/concerns, but I really see
> > no reasons to drop it from the mm tree now and start the discussion
> > from scratch.
> I do not think this is ready for the current merge window. Sorry! I
> would really prefer to see the whole thing in one series to have a
> better picture.

Please, provide any specific reason for that. I appreciate your opinion,
but *I think* it's not an argument, seriously.

We've discussed the patchset back to March and I made several iterations
based on the received feedback. Later we had a separate discussion with Greg,
who proposed an alternative solution, which, unfortunately, had some serious
shortcomings. And, as I remember, some time ago we've discussed memory.min
with you.
And now you want to start from scratch without providing any reason.
I find it counter-productive, sorry.


 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-05 12:17    [W:0.058 / U:0.060 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site