Messages in this thread | | | From | 禹舟键 <> | Date | Mon, 4 Jun 2018 16:57:17 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] Refactor part of the oom report in dump_header |
| |
Hi Michal
> I have earlier suggested that you split this into two parts. One to add > the missing information and the later to convert it to a single printk > output.
I'm sorry I do not get your point. What do you mean the missing information?
> but it still really begs an example why we really insist on a single > printk and that should be in its own changelog.
Actually , I just know that we should avoid the interleaving messages in the dmesg. But I don't know how to reproduce this issue. I think I can just recount this issue in the changelog.
Thanks
| |