lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH v11 00/27] ARM: davinci: convert to common clo ck framework​
From
Date
On Friday 25 May 2018 11:51 PM, David Lechner wrote:
> On 05/22/2018 04:38 AM, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> On Friday 18 May 2018 10:18 PM, David Lechner wrote:
>>> This series converts mach-davinci to use the common clock framework.
>>>
>>> The series works like this, the first 3 patches fix some issues with
>>> the clock
>>> drivers that have already been accepted into the mainline kernel.
>>>
>>> Then, starting with "ARM: davinci: pass clock as parameter to
>>> davinci_timer_init()", we get the mach code ready for the switch by
>>> adding the
>>> code needed for the new clock drivers and adding #ifndef
>>> CONFIG_COMMON_CLK
>>> around the legacy clocks so that we can switch easily between the old
>>> and the
>>> new.
>>>
>>> "ARM: davinci: switch to common clock framework" actually flips the
>>> switch
>>> to start using the new clock drivers. Then the next 8 patches remove all
>>> of the old clock code.
>>>
>>> The final four patches add device tree clock support to the one SoC that
>>> supports it.
>>>
>>> This series has been tested on TI OMAP-L138 LCDK (both device tree
>>> and legacy
>>> board file).
>>
>> If you do end up sending a v12, you can leave out the mach-davinci
>> portions unless there are any changes you need to make. I will pick them
>> up from this series once the driver dependencies are merged.
>>
>> I do hope the drivers/clk/* changes can be merged from v4.18.
>>
>
> I have resent all of the clk patches (including all of the ones I listed as
> dependencies in addition to the three remaining in this series) under the
> cover "clk: davinci: outstanding fixes​".
>
> I also found that we need to add power-domains properties to the PWM nodes
> in "ARM: dts: da850: Add clocks". I probably should just take your advice
> and just globally added them even if they are not documented for some types
> ofnodes.

I think doing it en masse will be controversial. Just add it to PWM
nodes for now (I am assuming the binding documentation agrees).

I have applied this series so please send any more changes as follow-on
patches.

Thanks
Sekhar

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-26 14:58    [W:0.083 / U:3.772 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site