lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 7/7] x86,idle: do not leave mm in idle state
Hmm, fair enough.  I think a better heuristic would be if the
estimated idle duration is more than, say, 10ms. I *think* the code
has been cleaned up enough that this is easy now. (Using time instead
of C6 will make it a lot less dependent on which idle driver is in
use.)
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:53 AM Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2018-06-22 at 08:36 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 12:57 PM Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Do not call leave_mm when going into a cstate. Now that mprotect
> > > and
> > > madvise no longer send IPIs for TLB shootdowns to idle CPUs, there
> > > is
> > > no real reason to disable lazy TLB mode in idle states.
> > >
> > > This seems to help performance on Broadwell systems. Haswell
> > > performance
> > > numbers are inconclusive.
> >
> > I'm skeptical. The code you're removing is more about power
> > consumption than about performance. If a task migrates from one cpu
> > to another, runs for awhile, and exits, we don't want to IPI the old
> > CPU if the old CPU is deeply asleep. The logic you're removing is a
> > bit awkwardly written, but the intent is to only do the leave_mm() in
> > deep sleep. We should arguably change the condition to check the
> > expected sleep duration instead of the microarchitectural properties
> > of the target state, though.
>
> That is fair.
>
> A quick hack could be to just remove the tlb flush
> from C3 state (which gets called a lot), but keep
> it for C6 state and deeper (which get called more
> when a CPU is really idle).
>
> --
> All Rights Reversed.

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-22 18:01    [W:0.105 / U:0.752 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site