Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 22 Jun 2018 16:05:47 +0200 (CEST) | From | Thomas Gleixner <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH REBASED RESEND] x86/cpu: Move early cpu initialization into a separate translation unit |
| |
On Tue, 12 Jun 2018, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> __pgtable_l5_enabled shouldn't be needed after system has booted, we can > mark it as __initdata, but it requires preparation. > > This patch moves early cpu initialization into a separate translation > unit. This limits effect of USE_EARLY_PGTABLE_L5 to less code. > > Without the change cpu_init() uses __pgtable_l5_enabled. cpu_init() is > not __init function and it leads to section mismatch. > > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Second thoughts.
The only place where __pgtable_l5_enabled() is used in common.c is in early_identify_cpu() which is marked __init. So how is that section mismatch triggered?
Thanks,
tglx
| |