lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ARM: dts: am33xx: Add pinmux data for mmc1 in am335x-evm, evmsk and beaglebone
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com> wrote:
> am335x-evm, am335x-evmsk and am335x-beaglebone are currently relying on
> pinmux set by the bootloader to set the correct value for mmc1. Fix
> this by adding pinmux data for the same in kernel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Faiz Abbas <faiz_abbas@ti.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi | 9 ++++++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evm.dts | 9 ++++++++-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evmsk.dts | 9 ++++++++-
> 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> index e67b4d6..f9e8667 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-bone-common.dtsi
> @@ -161,7 +161,14 @@
>
> mmc1_pins: pinmux_mmc1_pins {
> pinctrl-single,pins = <
> - AM33XX_IOPAD(0x960, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE7) /* GPIO0_6 */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x960, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE7) /* spio0_cs1.gpio0_6 */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8fc, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat0.mmc0_dat0 */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8f8, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat1.mmc0_dat1 */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8f4, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat2.mmc0_dat2 */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x8f0, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_dat3.mmc0_dat3 */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x904, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_cmd.mmc0_cmd */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x900, PIN_INPUT_PULLUP | MUX_MODE0) /* mmc0_clk.mmc0_clk */
> + AM33XX_IOPAD(0x9a0, PIN_INPUT | MUX_MODE4) /* mcasp0_aclkr.mmc0_sdwp */

We went one pin too far on the Beagle's here:

0x9a0 ( mcasp0_aclkr.mmc0_sdwp ) = Routed to P9_42, (muxed with C18,
to a shared pin on the header), so not connected to the microSD
socket...

https://github.com/beagleboard/beaglebone-black/blob/master/BBB_SCH.pdf

Looking at this evm schematic, it looks like 0x9a0 should be removed
too, but I'm not sure on all revisions:

http://processors.wiki.ti.com/images/a/a2/TMDSSK3358_3H0009_REV1_2B_SCH.pdf

Regards,

--
Robert Nelson
https://rcn-ee.com/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-18 22:58    [W:0.809 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site