lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3.18 00/21] 3.18.113-stable review
Date
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:

> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 03:08:12PM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote:
>> stable-rc/linux-3.18.y boot: 52 boots: 28 failed, 18 passed with 1 offline, 5 conflicts (v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9)
>>
>> Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9/
>> Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-3.18.y/kernel/v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9/
>>
>> Tree: stable-rc
>> Branch: linux-3.18.y
>> Git Describe: v3.18.112-22-gb0582263e3c9
>> Git Commit: b0582263e3c9810fd887ca92d19cb9ff30a4d9f6
>> Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
>> Tested: 24 unique boards, 12 SoC families, 13 builds out of 183

[...]

>
> That is a lot of new failures, did the whole lab fail, or is this really
> a problem in v3.18.112 here?

Whole lab failure (more precisely, lab operator failure) ;)

gak, I updated the rootfs images to the latest buildroot, which forced
me to upgrade the kernel headers used to build the rootfs from v3.10 to
v4.4. So I guess it's no surprise that every single board panic'd as
soon as it hit userspace.

I downgraded the rootfs, and re-ran all those boot tests, and now things
are 100% passing in my lab.

Sorry for the noise,

Kevin

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-14 02:10    [W:0.242 / U:0.172 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site