lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2018]   [Jun]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCHv3 01/17] mm: Do no merge VMAs with different encryption KeyIDs
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 05:45:24PM +0000, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 06/12/2018 07:38 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > VMAs with different KeyID do not mix together. Only VMAs with the same
> > KeyID are compatible.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/mm.h | 7 +++++++
> > mm/mmap.c | 3 ++-
> > 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > index 02a616e2f17d..1c3c15f37ed6 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -1492,6 +1492,13 @@ static inline bool vma_is_anonymous(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > return !vma->vm_ops;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifndef vma_keyid
> > +static inline int vma_keyid(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> > +{
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +#endif
>
> I'm generally not a fan of this #ifdef'ing method. It makes it hard to
> figure out who is supposed to define it, and it's also substantially
> more fragile in the face of #include ordering.
>
> I'd much rather see some Kconfig involvement, like
> CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEM_ENCRYPTION or something.

Well, it's matter of taste, I guess. I do prefer per-function #ifdef'ing.
It seems more flexible to me.

I can rework it if maintainers prefer to see config option instead.

--
Kirill A. Shutemov
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2018-06-13 22:14    [W:0.064 / U:2.648 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site